top of page
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in E-Commerce: Effectiveness and Challenges

Author: Narendra Kumar, National Law Institute University, Bhopal


Introduction

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) is defined as the application of online technology and platforms to resolve disputes outside of traditional courts. For India's burgeoning e-commerce industry, ODR offers a quick and inexpensive alternative to adjudication. By employing tools such as online mediation, arbitration, chatbots and video conferencing, ODR can facilitate small-value e-commerce disputes to be handled quickly. The COVID-19 pandemic and digital payments revolution have created the imperative to build ODR channels, which can decongest congested consumer commissions and courts. In this article, the legal framework of India for e-commerce disputes is mapped, current public and private ODR mechanisms are analysed, their actual performance assessed, and the main challenges and reforms suggested.


Legal Framework for E-Commerce Disputes and ODR

India's law supports electronic dispute resolution explicitly and implicitly. The Information Technology Act, 2000, gives legal effect to electronic contracts, records, and signatures, and the Indian Evidence Act allows electronic records as evidence before a court.. These make online agreements enforceable under law, and proceedings before ODR need not be unnecessarily abandoned in fear of the admissibility of digital evidence. Likewise, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allows arbitration and conciliation in any form, and courts have freely enforced contracts of arbitration concluded online. Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure also promotes the settlement of disputes by ADR, an extension of which is possible through online mediation or conciliation..

More precisely, laws and regulations support e-commerce and technology-enabled ADR. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, specifically includes ADR and online proceedings. In practice, the 2019 Act "encourages parties to undergo mediation at any stage", including before a case is formally heard. Important, the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020, obliges all online marketplaces to establish "proper grievance redressal mechanisms". Each e-tailer is to appoint and advertise the contact information of a grievance officer, respond to grievances within 48 hours and resolve them within 30 days. E-commerce websites are also obliged to become part of the Government's consumer grievance network. These norms effectively open the door to ODR by making online complaint capture and resolution channels mandatory at the merchant level..

India has also ratified the UN Convention on Mediation 2018 towards passing mediated settlement agreements, a step that is set to enhance online mediation's legitimacy. Generally, India's legal framework is largely ODR-conducive, electronic transactions are legally enforceable, ADR is promoted, and special provisions for consumer and payment disputes exist. The framework remains in the process of evolving, though. Experts suggest targeted ODR legislation or amendments to specifically acknowledge ODR proceedings in legislations such as the Commercial Courts Act and the Consumer Act. Amendments can also be required to further enhance data protection and confidentiality, which would enhance trust in ODR platforms.


Government ODR programs and websites

The centre and state governments have launched some ODR-based consumer and small dispute platforms. A flagship initiative is the National Consumer Helpline and the Integrated Grievance Redressal Mechanism portal linked to it. The success of NCH is seen through rising usage: complaints per month addressed increased from 37,000 in 2017 to over 112,000 in 2024. NCH has also partnered with over 1,000 companies from various industries to get complaints addressed in time. If a complaint is not addressed, NCH urges consumers to approach the concerned Consumer Commission under the Consumer Protection Act..

The Consumer Affairs Department is introducing Mediation Cells in District Commissions under Section 74 of the CPA 2019. Cells provide for the settlement of consumer complaints by an online mediator who is State-appointed or District Commission-appointed. The Act states that any settlement made by a conciliation officer can be noted as a Commission directive and therefore becomes enforceable. This provides for a court-associated online resolution forum where parties can file papers or provide evidence via video conference, while the resolution process is overseen by the mediator. Virtual conciliation hearings have already commenced by certain state consumer commissions.

The RBI's ODR System for Digital Payments is yet another key government initiative. Given the high number of failed UPI/IMPS transactions, the RBI instructed payment operators to implement automated ODR platforms by January 2021. The platforms drive payment grievances through a rule-based workflow with minimal human intervention. If a complaint in digital payments is not resolved in a month through ODR, the customer can approach the RBI Ombudsman. The policy places India among the world's first regulators to make ODR mandatory in the financial sector..

Finally, government websites have taken the complaints and negotiations of e-commerce consumers beyond courtrooms. The NCH/INGRAM system and RBI payment ODR are excellent examples of notable efforts with high activity levels. But they are facilitative; they prompt settlements of disputes but do not necessarily implement remedies. Outstanding complaints still go on to consumer courts or ombudsman schemes, where conventional adjudication resumes.


Private-Sector ODR and Corporate Practices

Beyond government schemes, many e-commerce and financial companies maintain their own ODR-like processes or partner with neutral platforms. Under the 2020 E-Commerce Rules, every online retailer must display the contact details of a grievance officer and adopt fair practices. In practice, these companies operate internal helpdesks, Chatbots and return portals to handle user complaints. For instance, all major marketplaces offer online refunds and replacement logistics, with dispute escalation built into their apps. These mechanisms are a form of in-house ODR. The success of such internal ODR is mixed; it depends on corporate policy and user awareness, but the legal mandate ensures that at least basic channels exist.

Financial institutions have also invested in ODR platforms. As noted, payment operators built the RBI-mandated ODR portals for transaction disputes. Similarly, banks and fintech firms often resolve small complaints through online forms and conciliators. Notably, a private ODR company, Sama’, provides an AI-enabled dispute resolution platform used by several banks. A 2019 study reports that ICICI Bank uses Sama’s system to resolve 10,000 customer disputes. Other platforms include the Centre for Online Dispute Resolution and Agami. These allow parties to reach binding agreements via uploaded documents and e-signatures. Globally, solutions like PayPal’s Resolution Centre and eBay’s dispute system demonstrate how technology can triage buyer-seller issues; Indian entrepreneurs are developing analogous tools domestically..

Finally, e-commerce and digital sectors have seen some ODR innovation through legal-tech ventures. For example, certain online marketplaces for freelancers or services embed arbitration clauses that can be adjudicated by nodal arbitrators via video links. As e-courts expand, there is potential for certified ODR providers to become part of the formal ADR ecosystem. However, these private sector channels mostly benefit those aware of and willing to pay for premium dispute services; their accessibility to the average consumer is still limited.


Effectiveness of ODR in Practice

Assessing effectiveness requires looking at accessibility, enforceability and user experience. On access, the government’s ODR portals have succeeded in attracting large complaint volumes, indicating awareness among a segment of users. The multilingual helpline and chatbot greatly enhance reach. Mobile apps and integration with platforms like UMANG have made NCH accessible on smartphones. Data shows a sharp rise in usage: monthly grievances filed grew from 37,000 in 2017 to over 112,000 by early 2024. The increasing number of “convergence” partners suggests corporate buy-in as well.

Enforceability is another concern. ODR settlements typically rely on party consent. A mediated agreement is not self-enforcing; if one side refuses to honour it, the only remedy is to litigate in court. The Consumer Act tries to address this; conciliation settlements can be recorded as orders by a Commission and become final. However, before a case reaches court, many ODR outcomes are “soft”, for example, a refund agreed in NCH gets implemented because the seller chooses to comply, not because of legal force. There is no dedicated Indian law that converts an ODR settlement into a court decree absent mutual filing. This lack of guaranteed enforceability can limit user confidence. In contrast, court-sanctioned mediation does produce binding orders. Similarly, arbitration awards generated online are fully enforceable under the Arbitration Act, but arbitration is rarely used for small consumer claims..

In the private sphere, corporate ODR is hit-or-miss. E-commerce giants do resolve many disputes, but also regularly face enforcement action for non-compliance. One district commission fined Amazon ₹35,000 in 2016 for failing to address a customer’s request. Independent ODR platforms boast success stories, but impartial data on win rates and satisfaction is scarce. The lack of published metrics makes it hard to judge efficacy.


Recommendations for Reform and Improvement

Several targeted reforms can significantly improve India's ODR infrastructure. First, a dedicated ODR law or amendments to the current law should statutorily define ODR, require minimum procedural and ethical standards, and render certified platform settlements automatically enforceable with registration with a consumer forum or court. Second, an effective, multilingual outreach programme through DoCA, Jago Grahak Jago and compulsory disclosures by platforms during checkout would inform consumers and un-mystify online dispute routes. Third, technology innovations mobile-first, low-bandwidth portals, complaint triage based on AI, Aadhaar-based e-KYC/OTP authentication, and ODR kiosks in Common Service Centres, would make it easier and more efficient, particularly in rural India. Lastly, ODR integration in the formal justice system court-annexed online conciliation portals, and judicial referral of small-value cases would institutionalise digital ADR and offer a seamless continuum from online mediation to enforceable orders.


Conclusion

ODR in Indian e-business is on the rise, but it can be useful. Legal changes, government web portals such as NCH/INGRAM, and private initiatives have developed faster and easier processes than in court. More individuals are utilising these services, and initiatives such as RBI's ODR mandate place India at the forefront of countries in this area. Yet, there remain some disadvantages. Some consumers remain unaware of the ODR facility, and matters such as enforcement of orders, standard procedures, and accessibility by electronic means have to be resolved. The COVID-19 pandemic shift to online services and increasing digital payments are in favour of ODR, coupled with evolving court practice and what consumers want. With reforms to provide legal recognition, increasing awareness, and developing technology infrastructure, particularly in high-priority areas, ODR can be the preferred method of resolving small e-commerce disputes, while the courts handle the more complex ones. In the long term, it could be a digital-age "Lok Adalat" making consumer justice more accessible and effective.


References





Related Posts

RECENT POSTS

THEMATIC LINKS

bottom of page