AUTHOR: CHAITANYA SAXENA, MAHATMA JYOTIBA PHULE ROHILKHAND UNIVERSITY
Abstract
Money laundering has changed from sticking wads of notes in a suitcase to transferring invisible digital data. This creates a massive challenge for global law enforcement. In the face of anti-money laundering (AML) policy and regulation, the article grapples with real-world questions of what values actually drive society's financial system. By this we mean more than a list of dry jurisprudential facts-think how funds move through the banking system, and where they must stop if shady transactions are to be avoided. We look at international efforts to stem preventing "dirty money", and ask why, in spite of these strict laws, it is relatively simple for criminals to launder profits from illegal activities. The discussion emphasizes the critical weaknesses in the current system, especially how the rise of digital currencies and cybercrime has redesigned the battlefield. But we argue that, in spite of its view as a follower, law needs to abide by novel technologies like AI and blockchain. These offer the necessary tools to seal up these loopholes and provide an encouraging pathway for a more transparent and secure global economy.
Keywords: Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Financial Action Task Force (FATF), KYC, Cryptocurrency, Artificial Intelligence, RegTech, Financial Crime.
Introduction
Imagine a shadow economy so massive that it nearly equals the GDP of the entire United Kingdom. According to the United Nations, criminals successfully launder up to $2 trillion every year. It is crucial to understand that this is not a victimless "white-collar" crime; this "dirty money" is the lifeblood of drug cartels, terrorist networks, and human traffickers. If you stop the money, you stop the crime.
This brings us to compliance with Anti Money Laundering (AML). If global finance were an animal, then AML would be its immune system. It's a complicated system that comprises international laws and regulations, banking procedures designed to warn people when money laundering might occur.
However, the battlefield is fast becoming different now. The days of smuggling physical suitcases full to capacity with cash are disappearing. Today, we live in a digital world with no borders where money moves instantly through cryptocurrencies or complex cyber networks. This change creates a dangerous gap in a world where traditional laws are applied to new realities.
This article aims to clarify the legal structure. Let's look at the general regulatory frameworks that every country should adhere to. Then, we delve fully into the problem and lay out each gap where criminals are able to escape. Finally, we will consider how future imponderables such as AI are reforming old rules and ensuring finance's safe course.
Global Standards and Regulatory Foundations
Money moves instantly with a mouse click, but laws traditionally stop at national borders. If a criminal moves stolen funds from London to a remote island, British police can’t simply fly over and seize it. To solve this jurisdictional nightmare, the world relies on a "global handshake" of standards.
The Global Policymaker: FATF The most important player is the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Think of FATF as the world’s "compliance watchdog." They don't write laws directly; instead, they issue the 40 Recommendations. These are the gold standards that countries are expected to adopt. If a country ignores them, FATF can place them on a "Grey List," effectively warning the global economy that doing business there is risky.
The Supporting Cast: UN, Basel, and OECD FATF don’t work alone.
UN Conventions: These provide the legal bedrock, requiring member nations to criminalize money laundering in the first place.
Basel Committee: While FATF focuses on crime, the Basel Committee focuses on banking safety. They ensure banks have strict internal controls so they don't collapse from criminal exposure.
OECD: They tackle the tax angle, ensuring countries share tax data so criminals can't hide wealth offshore.
The Core Concepts: KYC and RBA How do these high-level rules work on the ground? They translate into two daily practices for every bank:
Know Your Customer (KYC): This is the first line of defence. Before opening an account, a bank must verify who you are. It’s like the ID check at a nightclub—no ID, no entry. This ensures banks aren't dealing with "phantom" companies.
The Risk-Based Approach (RBA): This is the theoretical heart of modern compliance. Banks cannot watch every transaction with the same intensity. Instead, they use RBA to allocate resources. A grandmother transferring $50 for a birthday present is "Low Risk." A politician transferring $10 million from a tax haven is "High Risk." The RBA ensures compliance officers focus their energy where the danger is real.
From Global Rules to Local Laws Finally, these international standards must be turned into local law to have teeth.
In the USA: The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) is the grandfather of AML laws, requiring American banks to report any suspicious activity to the government.
In the Europe Union: They use AML Directives (we are currently on the 6th, or "6AMLD"). Unlike the US's single act, the EU constantly updates its directives to close loopholes across all member states.
Persistent Weaknesses in the Financial System
Why, then, despite the presence of strict global laws I've just described, is money laundering still happening on such a gargantuan scale? The answer to this is in the system’s "cracks." Ruthlessly efficient, criminals are constantly seeking weak points in a world where international cooperation frays.
The 'Shell Game'—Who Really Owns Them The biggest loophole in world finance is the Shell Company. This is like a "burner phone" for corporations. On paper, it has the name and address of its bank but in reality, there are no employees or offices. Criminals use these to buy property or transfer cash anonymously.
The core problem here is Beneficial Ownership. In many jurisdictions, you don't have to list the actual human (the beneficial owner) who controls the company; instead, you can list another company as the owner. By stacking layers of companies across different countries, criminals have carefully built a maze police will find impossible to solve.
Regulatory Arbitrage: Jurisdiction Shopping Money flows like water: it always follows the path of least resistance. This is called Regulatory Arbitrage. Since laws vary by country, launderers go "shopping" for jurisdictions with the weakest rules. They might steal money in France (strict rules), move it through a bank in a small island nation with lax controls, and then send it to the US as "clean" investment capital. As long as there is one weak link in the global chain, the entire system is vulnerable.
The "De-Risking" Dilemma Sometimes, strict enforcement backfires. Banks are so terrified of billion-dollar fines for missing a laundered transaction that they simply stop doing business in high-risk regions entirely. This is called De-Risking. For example, a major bank might stop serving charities in conflict zones. The problem? The money doesn't stop moving; it just goes underground. People turn to unregulated, informal cash networks (like Hawala), which are completely invisible to regulators. Ironically, by trying to be too safe, the system pushes money into the shadows where it cannot be tracked at all.
Case Illustration: The Panama Papers A prime example of this breakdown in border defences is provided by the Panama Papers (2016) leak. It is one major data breach that shows how one law firm created more than two hundred thousand shell companies for politicians, showbusiness celebrities, and outright criminals. It showed that concealing the “Beneficial Owner” is not just a flaw in theory--it is an industrial-scale.
Emerging Online and Cyber-Enabled Risks
If the previous section was about the "cracks" in the old system, this section is about a whole new battlefield. The days of criminals struggling to carry heavy suitcases full of cash are ending. Today, laundering is digital, instant, and terrifyingly anonymous.
The Crypto Paradox: Transparent but opaque to a law student familiar with cryptocurrencies, a fascinating paradox appears: blockchain is a public house—every transaction has been recorded forever. It should be the best evidence to use in a lawsuit, right? There is still room for doubt. There are special tools available to criminals called "Mixers" and Tumblers" to destroy evidence chains. Ten people throw their wallets in a dark room, shake them up, and then ten random people walk out with the same amount of cash. You know the money's moved but no longer can connect Sender to Receiver. This "scrambling" can make it difficult if not impossible to trace dirty money.
Virtual Assets: The New Art of Laundering It’s not just Bitcoin. We are seeing the rise of Virtual Assets (VAs) like Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and even in-game currencies (like V-Bucks or gold in World of Warcraft). Here is the scheme: A criminal uses stolen funds to buy a digital image (NFT) for $1 million. They then sell it to an accomplice (or themselves) for "clean" crypto. To the bank, this just looks like a lucky investment profit, not the proceeds of a drug deal. This sector is largely unregulated, making it a "Wild West" for compliance officers.
Cyber-Laundering and "Money Mules" Technology also allows criminals to outsource the risk. This leads to the phenomenon of Money Mules. Criminals recruit ordinary people online—often via fake "Work from Home" job ads or romance scams. These victims are asked to receive money into their personal bank accounts and wire it somewhere else, keeping a small commission. The "Mule" thinks they are processing payments for a legit company. In reality, they are layering stolen funds. When the police follow the money trail, it leads to the student or the retiree, while the real criminal remains safely hidden behind a VPN in another country.
The Jurisdictional Nightmare Finally, the internet has no borders, but the Law does. A cyber-crime might involve a hacker in Russia, using a server in Brazil, stealing from a victim in London, and laundering the money through an exchange in Singapore. For a lawyer, this creates a massive conflict of laws. Which country has jurisdiction? Which police force investigates? This "speed of light" movement of money is currently faster than the "speed of law" international cooperation.
Advanced Technologies Strengthening Compliance
We have talked about the problems; now let's talk about the solution. It is not all doom and gloom. The same technology that criminals use to hide is now being "weaponized" by banks and regulators to catch them. This new field is called RegTech (Regulatory Technology). Think of it as the "Iron Man suit" for compliance officers—giving them superpowers to fight financial crime.
From "Dumb" Rules to Smart AI In the past, banks used simple, rigid rules. For example: "If a transaction is over $10,000, flag it." Criminals easily beat this by transferring $9,900. Today, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning have changed the game. Instead of just looking at the amount, AI looks at behaviours. It can analyse millions of transactions in seconds to find patterns a human would miss.
Example: If a student with zero income suddenly starts receiving money from five different countries at 3 AM every night, the AI flags it as suspicious—even if the amounts are small. This is Predictive Monitoring: stopping the crime before the money leaves the building.
Blockchain for Good We previously mentioned blockchain as a tool for criminals, but it is also a powerful tool for the law. Because blockchain records are "immutable" (they cannot be changed or deleted), they can create a shared, trusted history of identity. Imagine a "Shared KYC Ledger." Instead of you handing your passport to five different banks, you verify your identity once on a secure blockchain. All the banks can trust that record. This prevents criminals from using fake documents to open accounts.
Automated KYC and Biometrics The "ID check" has also gone digital. Automated KYC uses biometrics—like facial recognition and "liveness detection" (asking you to blink or smile at your phone camera). This makes it incredibly hard for a criminal to open an account using a stolen ID card or a deepfake photo.
The "False Positive" Trap: A Word of Caution However, for a law student, it is vital to remember: Technology is not a judge. AI systems often generate "False Positives"—flagging innocent people as terrorists just because they have a similar name or travel pattern. If banks rely only on machines, they risk excluding legitimate customers from the financial system. Therefore, the future of compliance isn't just robots; it’s "Human-in-the-Loop." We need smart algorithms to find the needles in the haystack, but we still need smart lawyers and officers to decide what to do with them.
Conclusion
As we conclude, one thing is clear: the fight against money laundering is a permanent arms race. Every time regulators build a ten-foot wall, criminals build an eleven-foot ladder.
Although FATF is a good global "rulebook", its structure has many flaws. Criminals continue to use anonymous shell companies and the speed of crypto assets to hide their traces. They are proficient at "jurisdiction shopping", i.e., looking for gaps in laws between one jurisdiction and another when protecting stolen wealth.
For the future generation of lawyers, only smarter rules, and not more rules at all, can provide a solution. What’s next: There is a need for an international standard on this stuff; if you have one, everyone knows your name-no more hiding in tax havens. Adapting to The Future: The posture of 'defence'; responding after a crime When taking strategic risk measures to prevent crime such as adopting Machine Intelligence law and real-time international collaboration, we can create a financial industry that is both open for business--yet firmly closed against crime.
References
Financial Action Task Force (FATF), What to do, FATF (last visited Dec.08, 2025), https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/the-fatf/what-we-do.html
Financial Action Task Force (FATF), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation: The FATF Recommendations 2012 (Oct.16, 2025), https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf?nocache=true
Shashwat Anand, Money Laundering: A Complete Perspective (SSRN Working Paper No.2315055, Aug. 23, 2013), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2315055
Md Ileas Pramanik, Emerging Technological Trends in Financial Crime and Money Laundering, 5 J. POSTHUMANISM 3611, 3611-3633 (2025), https://posthumanism.co.uk/jp/article/view/2493/1371
W. Gaviyau & A. Bongani Sibindi, Global Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing Regulatory Framework: A Critique, 16 J. RISK & FIN. MGMT. 313 (2023), https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/7/313
Fabiano Angelico, Real Estate Anti-Money Laundering in the Global South, TRENDS ORGANISED CRIME (2025), https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12117-025-09578-0
Harsh Verma, The Impact of Cryptocurrency on Money Laundering Practices, INT’L J. COMP. SCI & ACAD. (2024), https://ijcsacademia.com/index.php/journal/article/view/96/110
Iboro Akpan Essien, AI-Driven Governance Systems for Proactive Regulatory Compliance and Fraud Risk Management in Financial Service Environments, ENG’G & TECH. J. (2025), https://everant.org/index.php/etj/article/view/2215/1618
Naga Ramesh Palakurti, Emerging Trends in Financial Fraud Detection: Machine Learning and Big Data Analytics in Risk Management, INT’L J. ADV. RSCH. SCI. COMM. & TECH. (2024), https://ijarsct.co.in/Paper13555D.pdf
Panama Papers, WIKIPEDIA (last visited Dec.09, 2025), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Papers













